It stops low risk cases from clogging the queue so analysts can focus on the alerts that actually matter.
Are low-risk KYB onboarding cases clogging your pipeline?
Published on
2025-08-13 11:36
Updated on
2025-12-14 10:33
The hidden cost of treating every screening the same
Many compliance teams still review every onboarding case the same way. Full review. Same queue. Same process.
Low risk, medium risk, high risk. All mixed together.
As onboarding volumes grow, this creates quiet but serious problems.
Low risk customers eat up analyst time.
High risk alerts get buried.
Clean cases slow everything down.
Analysts spend time sorting instead of solving.
Nothing is missed. But the wrong work happens first.
Start with risk, not randomness
The smartest teams flip the order.
They start with risk.
Strise helps compliance teams automatically prioritize onboarding queues using real risk signals. Not ticket order. Not gut feel. Not manual sorting.
That means you can:
- Review the riskiest cases first
- Automatically handle low risk cases based on your rules
- Flag complex or unclear cases for immediate attention
Every case is still screened. They are just handled in the right order.
.gif)
The right cases, in the right order
Think of it like airport security.
Everyone is screened. But not everyone stands in the same line.
Higher risk passengers are routed differently. Trusted travelers move faster. Security focuses where it matters most.
That is what automated prioritization does for onboarding.
This is not just queue sorting. It is workflow level decision making.
Because it is fully configurable, you stay in control:
- Set your own risk thresholds
- Build logic around your team’s expertise
- Route the right cases to the right people
Real impact, not just time saved
You cannot scale your team every time onboarding spikes.
But you can make sure the time you already have is spent on real risk.
Some Strise customers automate KYB reviews for millions of entities each year. Analysts focus on judgment calls instead of routine checks.
For regulated businesses, automating low risk onboarding leads to:
- Lower operating costs
- Faster response to real risk
- A smoother customer experience when most competitors still treat everyone the same
Less noise. More signal. Better outcomes.
Frequently asked questions
What problem does risk based prioritization solve?
This is some text inside of a div block.
Do you still screen every customer?
Yes. Every case is screened. The difference is the order and the routing. High risk and complex cases surface first, low risk cases can be handled automatically based on your rules.
This is some text inside of a div block.
How is this different from queue sorting?
Queue sorting just changes the order of tickets. Risk based prioritization uses risk signals to decide what should be reviewed first and where each case should go in the workflow.
This is some text inside of a div block.
What does Strise prioritize on?
Real risk signals from your onboarding and screening data. You set thresholds and logic that match your policies and risk appetite.
This is some text inside of a div block.
Who is this for?
Compliance teams handling KYB, KYC, or AML onboarding at scale, especially when volumes fluctuate and manual queues slow everything down.
This is some text inside of a div block.
Goodbye, backlogs
Hello, AML automation
We're entering a new era where AML teams eliminate compliance backlogs and fight financial crime with unmatched efficiency. No longer just a cost center, financial crime units become a vital driver of business success. AI is powering this transformation, and it's happening now!
